Illustrative sample
Academic Performance Overview
Most AI tools check writing. AcademicCheck checks whether you answered the assignment.
This is a sample report layout — not a live analysis of a real paper, and not a promise of any score. See how the diagnosis starts from the brief, then ranks what to fix first.
Assignment question
To what extent has mobile money improved financial inclusion for rural households in Ghana since 2015? Critically evaluate competing explanations and support your argument with evidence.
Partially answers the brief
The draft covers mobile money and rural access, but stays descriptive. It does not take a clear position on “to what extent,” and competing explanations are named more than weighed against evidence.
72 Overall Score
Almost Ready
The draft addresses the question but the thesis is still descriptive. Evidence is present; several claims need closer source integration. Citations are mostly consistent with APA 7 with a few formatting gaps.
- Improvement potential
- +14
- Time to improve
- ~35 minutes
Top 3 Critical Fixes
What matters most — fix these first.
Sharpen the thesis into a contestable claim
The opening states a topic rather than an arguable position that answers the command word.
Fix this first.
- Priority
- Critical
- Est. improvement
- +8 points
- Difficulty
- Easy
- Est. time
- 10 minutes
Deepen evidence in paragraphs 3–4
Claims move faster than the sources support. Add one stronger citation or quotation per key claim.
- Priority
- High
- Est. improvement
- +6 points
- Difficulty
- Moderate
- Est. time
- 15 minutes
Citation consistency (APA 7)
Reference list and in-text years are mostly aligned; a handful of entries need italics and DOI formatting.
- Priority
- High
- Est. improvement
- +4 points
- Difficulty
- Easy
- Est. time
- 10 minutes
Biggest Improvement Opportunity
Thesis & question fit
Turning the thesis into a contestable claim unlocks clearer paragraph purpose and a stronger conclusion.
Key Strengths
- Clear awareness of the assignment question
- Readable structure with topic sentences
- Honest engagement with opposing views
Key Weaknesses
- Thesis still descriptive
- Uneven source integration
- Conclusion restates rather than synthesizes
See this on your own draft
No account required for a first look. Create a free account later to save reports and track Academic Progress.
Diagnostic feedback only — not an official grade. Academic integrity